People Analytics Deconstructed

Measurement Mini Series, Part 2: Understanding reliability of measurement in People Analytics

Millan Chicago Season 1 Episode 10

In the second episode of a special three part mini-series about measurement, co-hosts Ron Landis and Jennifer Miller discuss how reliability of measurement is critical in People Analytics.  

In this episode, we had conversations around these questions:  

  • What is reliability?  
  • Why is it is important to consider the reliability of measures?  
  • What are the different types of reliability?  
  • How do I determine the reliability of a measure?   
  • What are some of the steps that HR professionals can take to assess the reliability of the assessments used in their organization?  

Key Takeaways:  

  • In order to measure something accurately, we must ensure that our measures are first reliable. One of the most critical questions when selecting or developing a new measure or metric is whether that measure provides consistent scores. 
  • In the People Analytics field, the term reliability is defined as the consistency of a measure. In essence, we want to know whether what we are measuring is consistent across time (I.e., test-retest reliability), content (I.e., internal consistency), and/or raters (I.e., observer reliability).  
  • Different types of reliability evidence require different types of data collection efforts, but the central analysis is the same. Ron and Jennifer talked about ways by which we could operationally assess the reliability of any measures that we use. 
  • In addition, they also talked about some rules of thumb for what is "reliable enough." 
  • At the end of the episode, Jennifer and Ron recommend steps for folks just starting out in this space all the way to the more advanced HR professional.  

 Related Links